#30: Stop Shielding Design Teams—Start Positioning Them for Impact

Leading a design team is like parenting—both require balance, trust, and knowing when to steer versus when to let go. The best ideas don’t just need execution; they need context, advocacy, and alignment to thrive. Yet, many design teams fall into the overprotective parent trap—shielding their work from outside influence, believing that if nurtured in secrecy, it will emerge fully formed and undeniable.

This instinct, while well-intentioned, is fatal to impact. As kids need exposure to the world to grow, design ideas need real-world friction, feedback, and buy-in to succeed.

The Four Myths of Confidentiality-Driven Design

Myth 1: If It’s Good Enough, It Will Be Prioritized

This myth assumes that the inherent quality of an idea will guarantee its success. However, in organizations, prioritization is rarely about quality alone. It’s about alignment with strategic goals, timing, and the ability to build momentum. A brilliant design solution that doesn’t resonate with business objectives or stakeholder needs is like a child who excels academically but struggles to navigate social dynamics—it won’t reach its full potential.

Beneath this myth lies a fear that excellent work should “speak for itself”—pushing too hard for visibility might seem self-serving, or advocating early may invite unwanted scrutiny. But in reality, ideas that stay hidden rarely gain traction. Success in design isn’t just about solving problems; it’s about ensuring those solutions gain recognition and buy-in.

Designers, in particular, struggle with this because they are often trained to believe their work exists in service of the user, not in service of internal politics. Many enter the field with a craftsman’s mindset, focused on refining their skills rather than playing the game of influence. Additionally, designers frequently operate in environments where their function is misunderstood or undervalued, making it even harder to advocate for their work without feeling like they’re fighting an uphill battle. The discomfort with self-promotion and a history of design being treated as an executional rather than strategic function creates a perfect storm where many talented designers hesitate to push their ideas forward.

🚀 Design Leadership Lesson: Teach your team to advocate for their work, not just execute it. Great design isn’t just about solving problems; it’s about ensuring those solutions gain traction. Equip your designers with the skills to communicate the value of their work in terms that resonate with stakeholders. This is akin to teaching children to articulate their thoughts and advocate for themselves. Here are some practical things you can start to do with your team to move them forward

  • Normalize Sharing Work in Progress: Encourage designers to share early and often through demos, Slack updates, or informal critiques.

  • Teach Business Fluency: Help designers frame their work regarding business impact, connecting design decisions to metrics that matter.

  • Build Platforms for Visibility: Create forums, such as design reviews or newsletters, where designers can showcase their work and its impact.

Myth 2: Stakeholders Will Dilute the Vision

Many designers fear that involving stakeholders too early will compromise the purity of their vision. But this fear is misguided. Avoiding collaboration doesn’t protect integrity—it ensures misalignment. It’s like raising children in a bubble, shielding them from diverse perspectives, and expecting them to thrive in a complex, interconnected world.

This fear is extreme among designers because their work is deeply tied to craft, creativity, and a sense of ownership. Many have experienced situations where well-intentioned feedback led to design-by-committee, where every stakeholder wants a say, and the result feels compromised.

Over time, this creates a defensive mindset where designers try to perfect their work in isolation before exposing it to potential “threats.” However, great design isn’t just about a singular vision—it’s about creating something that works within real-world constraints and is embraced by the people who bring it to life.

🚀 Design Leadership Lesson: The best way to safeguard design quality is to bring stakeholders into the process early and often. When people feel ownership over the solution, they become advocates rather than critics. This is similar to involving children in family decisions, which helps them develop a sense of responsibility and prepares them for real-world challenges. Here are some practical things you can do:

  • Redefine Collaboration as a Strength: Help designers see feedback as a tool to refine their vision, not compromise it.

  • Introduce Feedback Milestones: Set structured check-ins to ensure designers maintain control while stakeholders feel included.

  • Model the Behavior: Demonstrate how to navigate stakeholder conversations, showing that collaboration doesn’t mean surrendering good design.

Myth 3: Collaboration Slows Us Down

There’s a common belief that involving too many voices will slow progress. But what’s more inefficient: taking time upfront to build alignment, or spending months reworking a solution that never had a path to success? When done right, collaboration accelerates impact by ensuring that the work is grounded in reality and supported by key stakeholders.

This fear is deeply rooted in design’s history. For decades, designers have fought for a seat at the table, often struggling against environments where design was treated as an afterthought or reduced to aesthetics. As a result, many have internalized the idea that design needs to be protected rather than shared—that collaboration means inviting in unnecessary constraints, endless feedback loops, or decision-making driven by those who don’t fully understand design principles. This fear is valid but leads to a defensive approach that ultimately backfires. When designers avoid collaboration to move fast, they often run in circles, fixing misalignments that could have been prevented.

🚀 Design Leadership Lesson: True speed isn’t about how fast something is built—it’s about how quickly an idea moves from concept to impact. Just as raising an independent thinker takes patience, building alignment early in the design process ensures smoother execution later. Invest in collaboration upfront to avoid friction down the line. Here are some things to think about:

  • Teach the Difference Between Feedback and Consensus: Help designers gather diverse input without losing clarity of vision.

  • Introduce Collaboration Sprints: Use early time-boxed sessions to engage cross-functional partners, preventing last-minute roadblocks.

  • Reframe Collaboration as a Design Skill: Encourage designers to see stakeholder engagement as part of their craft, not a hindrance.

Myth 4: A Strong First Impression Will Get Our Work Prioritized

Some designers believe that presenting a fully polished solution at the right moment will guarantee buy-in. However, in matrixed organizations, prioritization isn’t solely about strength but sustained engagement. A single, impressive reveal is rarely sufficient to secure long-term support.

This belief stems from the historical positioning of design as a specialized, downstream function rather than a core part of strategic decision-making. In traditional industries, design was often confined to the "presentation layer," where it was expected to make products visually appealing after decisions had already been made. As a result, designers learned to operate like performers rather than collaborators—polishing their work in isolation, perfecting every detail, and unveiling it in a grand reveal, hoping to dazzle decision-makers into agreement. Yet, in today’s complex, cross-functional environments, design is no longer a final act—it’s an ongoing process that must be embedded in discussions long before the work is polished.

The scarcity of influence further reinforces this fear. Because many design teams have historically lacked decision-making power, designers often relied on rare, high-stakes opportunities to make an impact. The belief that "if I get just one shot, it has to be perfect" is a survival instinct born from years of exclusion from the room where decisions are made. However, modern influence is built through presence, not perfection. Work gets prioritized because it is visible, discussed, and iterated upon, not because it arrives fully formed.

🚀 Design Leadership Lesson: Work gets prioritized because it’s already part of the conversation, not because it’s compelling in isolation. Just as raising a child means embedding values and lessons over time, not delivering one perfect speech at age 18, design teams must engage continuously, building cross-functional momentum before leadership discussions even happen. Here are some things to think about.

  • Encourage Progress Over Perfection: Help designers focus on embedding design thinking early rather than perfecting isolated work.

  • Introduce a ‘Rolling Reveal’ Approach: Share incremental progress in structured touchpoints to build familiarity and buy-in over time.

  • Build Cross-Functional Relationships: Guide designers in forming relationships with PMs, engineers, and business leads to ensure design is part of collective decision-making.

The Path Forward: Elevating Design as a Catalyst for Impact

The challenge for design leaders is clear: how do we stop shielding our teams and prepare them to thrive in complex environments? Here are three key strategies:

  • Encourage Open Collaboration: Integrate design thinking into cross-functional discussions early to ensure work aligns with real-world constraints.

  • Teach Business Fluency: Prepare designers to convert user needs into business outcomes, enabling them to advocate effectively.

  • Embed Design in Decision-Making: Position design at the strategy table, ensuring it is regarded as a core function rather than a downstream activity.

Like rowing a boat, design success isn’t about waiting for the perfect moment but constant coordination, adaptation, and forward momentum. Leaders transform design from a tactical function into a strategic force by fostering collaboration, teaching business fluency, and embedding design in decision-making. When teams row together—aligned, resilient, and adaptable—they ensure their work reaches the shore of real impact.

Like this article? Here are some others that are similar:

Messy Middle 23: Messy First, Polished Later: The Secret to Getting More Done

Messy Middle #25: The best journeys aren’t always the smoothest

Previous
Previous

31: The Moment the Climb Slows Down

Next
Next

29 - Beyond Aesthetics: Mental Models for Strategic Design Management